The rights and functions of the king were of the highest and most extensive nature: he was the acknowledged lord of the soil; he alone taxed the people, and determined the services they were to perform; all offices of government were at his disposal, and all honours, as well as power, emanated from him, and were enjoyed only during his pleasure. Notwithstanding this away, he was not perfectly absolute and without check. On ascending the throne, he had to consider himself under certain restrictions: he was expected to follow the example of good princes; observe the customs of the country, and attend to the written rules handed down for the direction of kings. Of these rules the following are the principles: they are translated from the Pali, in which they are expressed in verse. Sattara sangraha wastoo
Sattara agati
Dasa raja Dhamma
Should a king act directly contrary to these rules, contrary to the example of good princes, and in opposition to the customs of the country, he would be reckoned a tyrant and the people would consider themselves justified in opposing him, and in rising in mass and dethroning him; nor are there wanting instances, in extreme cases of oppression, of their acting on this principle, and successfully redressing their wrongs. |
These rules, as you can see, represent more democracy then that is found in the world today. In Lanka today is the democracy left to us by the colonialists. Their democracy is represented by a vote, after which the voters rights seem to be forgotten!!
If in Lanka and even the world, these rules were applied to rulers. How much of a different world, would we all be in??